The E-Privacy Regulation focuses on regulating the confidentiality of communications (secrecy of telecommunications), the processing of communication data (previously traffic data) and the storage and reading of information on terminal equipment (e.g. cookies). This regulation is also intended to regulate the protection of privacy in connection with the display of telephone numbers and end-user directories, direct marketing by electronic communication and supervision. The controversial legislative process, which has been going on for more than four years, is now entering the final round.
The European legislator has decided to replace the Data Protection Directive for Electronic Communications (so-called E-Privacy Directive) with an e-Privacy Regulation. After the German legislator recently implemented on 1st December 2021 the European requirements from the E-Privacy Directive into German law by means of the amended Telecommunications Act (TKG) and the Telecommunications Telemedia Data Protection Act (TTDSG), the future E-Privacy Regulation will apply directly in the Member States.
At the beginning of the legislative process, it was envisaged that the e-Privacy Regulation would enter into force with the GDPR on 25 May 2018. The European Commission presented a draft e-Privacy Regulation on 10 January 2017 and the European Parliament’s lead LIBE Committee adopted its position on the proposed Regulation on 26 October 2017. However, negotiations in the Council of the EU have not progressed decisively since mid-January 2017. Even under the German Presidency, no agreement was reached in the Council in the second half of 2020. However, on 10 February 2021, the representatives of the Member States in the Council were able to agree on a common position after more than four years of negotiation. The EU legislator has thus taken a major step forward in the planned adoption. With a common position by the Council, the so-called trialogue negotiations between the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Commission can now finally begin. However, the positions of the Council and Parliament differ widely, so that in the year 2021 it has up to now only been possible to achieve little progress concerning detailed regulations. Therefore, a final agreement on the principal rules and an adoption are expected at the earliest in the course of 2022. After the entry into force of the Regulation, a 24-month transition period is currently foreseen before the Regulation can be applied.
The BfDI had initially successfully campaigned against the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action to ensure that regulations on data retention and on the further processing of communication metadata other than for the intended purpose and without the end-users’ consent were deleted in the Draft Regulation. Unfortunately, both points were reintroduced in the text of the Regulation under the Portuguese Presidency and adopted by the Council on 10 February 2021. The BfDI’s concerns about the general reduction of the level of data protection remained unheeded. The same was true for his request to entrust in an obligatory manner the data protection authorities with the data protection supervision on compliance with the e-Privacy Regulation, which is in accordance with the Commission’s draft. Thus, in some Member States, there is a risk of fragmentation of the supervisory landscape and of additional, unnecessarily complex coordination mechanisms between the various supervisory authorities in the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). This will make it more difficult to enforce data subjects’ rights.
The BfDI now hopes that in the trialogue negotiations, the European Parliament will be able to push for deleting again the regulations introduced by the Council, which are hostile to data protection, or at least for making them more data protection friendly. He will continue to advocate this objective in the context of his participation in the respective votes on the German position within the Council of the EU.